Nikola Tesla and sub-quantum kinetics

I am a big fan of Nikola Tesla, the famous engineer, physicist and inventor who developed the AC motor, among many other things, during his time in New York at the end of the nineteenth century. He was truly a genius.He was so gifted that he was said to be able to run experiments in his head and watch for any wear and tear, or problems in their design. He produced important, ground-breaking inventions and technologies but he also investigated and developed ideas that went counter to the current scientific orthodoxy. There is evidence that this wasn't well-received amongst the rich and powerful of the United States, and Tesla ended his life in poverty. According to reports, after he died, the FBI raided his rooms and took away all his papers. They eventually returned them to Tesla's solicitor, minus several key boxes of diagrams and notes.

One such anomalous physics phenomena that Tesla was very interested in was that a high-energy electrical discharge seemed to produce a gravitational wave. He knew this because the discharge occurred in a vacuum chamber and yet he felt the gravitational shock-wave while standing nearby, discounting the possibility that it was caused by an air-pressure wave. According to standard physics, such behaviour should be impossible, as charge and gravity are officially not related. There is evidence that Tesla's insight about charge and gravitational waves was picked up by Russian scientists, among others, described in the very interesting book ''the scientist, the madman, the thief and their lightbulb'.

I am also a big fan of Prof Paul Laviolette. He has developed a theory of matter creation that he calls sub-quantum kinetics, in which there is an ether and fluctuations in it give rise to matter and light propagation. Dr LaViolette's theory concludes that concentrations of new matter in our universe automatically trigger more matter creation. As a result, once matter is seeded in our universe, more matter is formed in concentrations of existing matter; there was no Big Bang (which makes sense as that theory contains blatant paradoxes such as the Baryon Asymmetry Problem and Boltzmann's Well-Ordered Universe Problem). All stars and planets gradually increase in size over time. Jupiter will eventually become a small star. Stars gain heavier and heavier elements as they grow, until they become enormous stellar bodies and have to shed the excess matter in enormous discharges that affect entire galaxies. Dr LaViolette, in his book Earth Under Fire, believes that these periodic, massive discharges caused the Younger Dryas impact event, Earth's axial precession and that the next discharge wave will hit our solar system imminently.

I'm mentioning both of these men because Dr LaViolette has posted a very interesting article on his website in which he points out that Nikola Tesla developed ideas that match Dr LaViolette's sub-quantum kinetics theory. Here is Dr LaViolette's article:

Dr Paul LaViolette Article on Nikola Tesla

If Nikola Tesla were alive today, he would be an ardent fan of subquantum kinetics. Here are some statements he had made over 80 years ago in which anticipated many aspects of subquantum kinetics.

July 6, 1930, the New York Times wrote about Tesla:

“Long ago he recognized that all perceptible matter comes from a primary substance, of a tenuity beyond conception and filling all space — the Akasa or luminiferous ether — which is acted upon by the life-giving Prana or creative force, calling into existence, in never ending cycles, all things and phenomena.The primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls or prodigious velocity become gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance.”

His view here was shared by theosophists Annie Besant and Charles Leadbeater. The idea of the life-giving Prana or creative force signifies the etheric reaction affinity that animates the ether, causing etherons to react with one another and transmute. This is equivalent to the idea in subquantum kinetics of the underlying etheric flux sustaining all things. His description of the primary substance (ether) being trown into infinitesimal whirls to form matter describes the idea of particle spin, which in subquantum kinetics is envisioned as an ether vortex at the particle’s center which is driven by the etheric flux that flows between the subatomic particle’s core and the Turing wave shell that immediately surrounds it. Currently, the Model G Vortical Motion Group is working to modify the Model G equation system to be able to represent spin. Just as Tesla described, if the transmutating etheric flux in subquantum kinetics were to subside, the ether would become subcritical and all matter would dematerialize. Just a featureless ether would remain; i.e., a vacuum.


July 11, 1934, p. 19, New York Herald Tribune reports:

“Dr. Tesla disclosed that he has lately perfected instruments which flatly disprove the present theory of the high physicists that the Sun is destined to burn itself out until it is a cold cinder floating in space. Dr. Tesla stated that he is able to show that all the suns in the universe are constantly growing in mass and heat, so that the ultimate fate of each is explosion.”

And again in August 18, 1935, in the New York Herald Tribune, Tesla writes:

“Condensation of the primary substance is going on continuously, this being in a measure proved,for I have established by experiments which admit of no doubt that the Sun and other celestial bodies steadily increase in mass and energy and ultimately must explode reverting to the primary substance.”

This is exactly the view of subquantum kinetics. Just as Tesla says, the Sun, the stars, and even planets are slowly growing in mass and luminosity through the process of continuous matter creation with genic energy making an important contribution. As a result, stars will not burn out. They will either explode in supernovae, as Tesla says, or grow into very massive mother stars which cyclically explode producing the so called galactic core explosions. It would be very interesting to find out what instruments Tesla had perfected to demonstrate this important prediction.

July 20, 1931, Time magazine quoted Tesla’s disagreement with special relativity:

“My conclusions in certain respects differ from and to that extent tend to disprove the Einstein Theory.”

Relativistic like effects like clock retardation and mass dilation emerge as corollaries of subquantum kinetics Model G without recourse to relativity.

July 10, 1932, p. 19, New York Times quotes Tesla as saying:

“It might be inferred that I am alluding to the curvature of space supposed to exist according to the teachings of relativity, but nothing could be further from my mind. I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties… To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved, is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view.”

Again, Tesla concords with sub-quantum kinetics in which gravitational masses attract one another without recourse to spatial curvature.

On September 11, 1932, in the New York Herald Tribune, Tesla wrote:

“… I showed that the universal medium is a gaseous body in which only longitudinal pulses can be propagated, involving alternating compressions and expansions similar to those produced by sound waves in the air. Thus a wireless transmitter does not emit Hertz waves which are a myth, but sound waves in the ether, behaving in every respect like those in the air, except that, owing to the great elastic force and extremely small density of the medium, their speed is that of light.”

Tesla’s sound wave analogy for the transmission of waves through the ether, of alternate regions of ether compression and ether expansion is similar to that of sub-quantum kinetics which explains light wave transmission as a reaction-diffusion wave in which the etheron concentrations rise and fall as the wave passes, much like air pressure rising and falling for the passing of a sound wave.

Over all, considering all these aspects, Tesla would have readily embraced the sub-quantum kinetics paradigm had he been alive today.

Dr Paul LaViolette.


What's especially fascinating, for me, about Nikola Tesla is that all the scientists I've ever known who talked about him have thought very highly of him. If I talked to any of them about him, they'd always agree that he was a genius, and yet if I gave them the above article, which clearly shows that Nikola Tesla was a strong advocate of a theory at least similar to Dr LaViolette's sub-quantum kinetics theory, they would dismiss it with a sneer without even reading it. It's a very sad state of affairs. Dr Laviolette's response to a question on this matter sums up the situation very well:

"Why is Sub-quantum Kinetics not taught in Universities or any other educational institution? It is because it entirely replaces physics as we know it, and because physics today does not want to change. Academic physicists today all want to be inquisition priests demanding obedience to their word. Unlike the Klu Klux Klan, they do not wear hoods. But they are not much better. The change will happen after the super-wave when most of society as we know it today will have collapsed."

It's a damning and bleak summation but I would have to agree with it. It's very much as the Nobel-Prize-Winning physicist and 'father' of quantum physics, Max Planck, once said:

“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”

As for the date of when 'the super-wave', that Dr LaViolette has mentioned above, finally hits us, please check out my articles on Gobleki Tepi and the End of Days, and Visionary Predictions of our future.